LIMS
Sample lifecycle, test methods, instrument results, specifications, CoAs and review-and-approve flows for QC and clinical labs.
LIMS, pharmacovigilance and quality workflows for pharma, biotech and laboratories — engineered with audit trails and e-signatures, and delivered with the documents your QA needs.
Bright Infonet develops GxP software in India, including LIMS, pharmacovigilance and QMS or document workflows, following a GAMP 5 risk-based approach. Systems support 21 CFR Part 11 and EU Annex 11 controls such as audit trails, e-signatures and ALCOA+ data integrity, and ship with a validation pack from URS to VSR. Your QA approves validation.
Regulated software has to do two jobs: support the lab or safety team’s work, and prove that it does so reliably. We design for the second from the start — audit trails, electronic signatures, access control and data integrity are part of the data model, not a later add-on.
We have built in this space ourselves: PVgenix, a pharmacovigilance SaaS with AI-assisted case intake, and a LIMS for NABL and ISO 15189 accredited labs and pharma QC. That experience shapes how we write requirements, trace them and test them.
We prepare the validation deliverables and execute testing with your team, but validation decisions and sign-off stay with your Quality Assurance function. That division is how GxP responsibility is meant to work, and we make it explicit in every project plan.
Sample lifecycle, test methods, instrument results, specifications, CoAs and review-and-approve flows for QC and clinical labs.
Case intake, triage, coding, assessment and submission workflows — the domain behind our PVgenix product.
Deviations, CAPA, change control and training records with routing, due dates and trend reports.
Authoring, review, approval, versioning and periodic review of SOPs with controlled distribution.
Instrument, ERP and safety-database interfaces with checks so data is not altered in transit.
AI-assisted intake or data extraction where every suggestion is reviewed and confirmed by a qualified person.
User requirements written with your process owners, and a plan setting scope, roles and approach.
GAMP 5 categorisation and function-level risk assessment to focus testing where patient and data risk is highest.
How the system meets each requirement, including audit trail, e-signature and access-control design.
Every requirement traced to its specification and test, so gaps are visible before an auditor finds them.
Test protocols, executed scripts, screenshots and deviations recorded to good documentation practice.
A VSR drafted for your QA to review, approve and release — the decision remains theirs.
Software alone cannot be Part 11 compliant; compliance comes from the system plus your procedures and validation. We build the technical controls — audit trails, e-signatures, access control, record retention — and document them for your QA.
No. We prepare the deliverables and help execute testing, but approval of the validation plan, protocols and summary report stays with your Quality Assurance team.
Typically a validation plan, URS, risk assessment, functional and design specifications, traceability matrix, IQ/OQ/PQ protocols with executed evidence, and a draft validation summary report.
Yes. We use GAMP 5’s risk-based approach and apply the critical-thinking principles of FDA’s Computer Software Assurance guidance to focus effort on high-risk functions.
Yes, with a qualified hosting setup, supplier assessment, backup and restore testing and clear responsibilities between you, us and the cloud provider.
Records must be attributable, legible, contemporaneous, original and accurate, plus complete, consistent, enduring and available. We enforce this through user identity, timestamps, audit trails and controlled retention.