Workflow map
The task broken into steps, with what the agent may do alone and what needs a person.
Assistants wired into your inbox, CRM, documents and internal systems — tested against real past work, with a human approving anything risky.
Bright Infonet builds AI agents that do real work inside your systems: reading emails and documents, looking up answers with RAG, updating tools like your CRM or calendar, and asking a person before risky actions. Every agent ships with an eval suite built from your real cases and monitoring for cost, accuracy and failures.
An agent is only useful if you can trust what it does. So we start from a narrow, repetitive task — triaging tickets, extracting data from documents, drafting replies — and measure how well the agent handles real past examples before it touches live work.
Under the hood we combine LLM APIs with retrieval over your own documents and tool calls into the systems you already use. Guardrails limit what the agent may do, risky steps wait for human approval, and every action is logged so you can see why it happened.
We work with teams across India and worldwide, and with businesses near Panchkula, Mohali and Chandigarh who prefer to map workflows face to face. A pilot on real data usually runs in weeks, not months.
The task broken into steps, with what the agent may do alone and what needs a person.
Manuals, SOPs, policies and past tickets indexed so answers cite the source they came from.
Secure connections to email, calendar, CRM, helpdesk, Slack or your own APIs.
A test set built from real past cases, run on every change so accuracy never silently drops.
Review screens for risky or unusual actions, with the agent’s reasoning and sources shown.
Dashboards for token spend, latency, error rates and eval scores, with alerts when they drift.
Sort, summarise and route incoming emails, and draft replies for a person to send.
Pull fields from invoices, forms, reports or case files into structured records.
Staff ask questions in plain language and get answers from your own documents, with citations.
Answer routine customer questions and hand complex ones to your team with context attached.
Move information between systems that don’t talk to each other, with a log of every change.
Read each case first and pre-fill fields, as we do in PVgenix, so reviewers never start from zero.
It is software that uses a language model to read information, decide the next step and act in your tools — such as updating a CRM or drafting a reply — within limits you set.
We test it against real past cases with an eval suite, restrict which actions it can take, and require human approval for risky steps. Monitoring flags drops in quality.
Retrieval-augmented generation lets the model answer from your own documents instead of its general training. You need it when answers must match your policies, products or records.
Running cost depends mostly on volume and model choice. We estimate it during the pilot and track token spend on a dashboard so there are no surprises.
We use provider settings that exclude your data from model training where available, limit access by role, and keep logs of what the agent read and did.
A focused pilot on real data usually takes a few weeks, ending with eval results you can use to decide whether to roll it out.